Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:42:38 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CPU underload Message-ID: <5640DB0E.8010005@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <1447090771.91534.477.camel@freebsd.org> References: <56348063.3090508@grosbein.net> <563500FC.8020201@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmo=EpmG6OJxq_v_mqKMF48h_B3K7vKqnnaKAi3x1s-uaWQ@mail.gmail.com> <5635148B.2070307@grosbein.net> <CAJ-VmomzkG8ZB0h1Qc=Oeny2ZOzQg1UirUprM_gmMy64F5ZRYw@mail.gmail.com> <56351AA6.80903@grosbein.net> <CAJ-VmomLen5p7ELejU7QtC5CO2j8hydb_CvdOqQsfaaMAtmdkA@mail.gmail.com> <563523CA.3040207@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmonpd8R5C%2BNvhOGFD1okkkit990DV8c4Dm%2BLmpZ2uFfVkA@mail.gmail.com> <56367686.4090801@grosbein.net> <CAJ-VmomtJ9eKfAJYfn4e2S1xWN8-YHo0M0KH-9V=VjNBf6vVVA@mail.gmail.com> <563707A0.3040700@grosbein.net> <CANCZdfrB0hkjmTU-9NzimBv=X_h-=bF0D2azBxg=9B=kmitv7Q@mail.gmail.com> <56370E1D.3040801@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmo=0vOAq8db_GeLWmdXr7xJdzUh44ZZJrQ9vVdpvzT9hiQ@mail.gmail.com> <563F5630.2000407@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmon8_kHeg3FOzK6T8amzF=-0ia0-Hb1ve2zZoEdgxrHO8g@mail.gmail.com> <563F938B.3070707@grosbein.net> <CAJ-Vmon=GwJhUaoS=AH5iOzEAdUUEcCz9%2BW6jdPq3h1TyXZ_3A@mail.gmail.com> <1447090771.91534.477.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10.11.2015 00:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 11:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> ok, what's the l1 cache size reported at boot up? >> >> I think I may just bump them all to 64. > > 64 is not some kind of magic panacea. The value needs to be set to the > cache line size for the runtime platform. If the right value is 32, > then setting it to 64 will just waste memory. Is it for instruction cache or for data cache?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5640DB0E.8010005>