From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 14:46:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FCA106566B; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dhcp170-36-red.yandex.net (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47197B295A; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FE1E175.4060005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:43:01 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120511 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sami Halabi References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, bz@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VNET X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:46:44 -0000 On 19.06.2012 12:56, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi, > > I want to ask aout VNET jails, i read somehwre that I'm able to run IPFW, > but not PF firewall in a cnet jail. > is that correct? > > i want a vnet jail basicly for nat, so natd with ipfw + ipdivert is my 1) You can do nat without vnet. 2) ipfw nat is currently the easiest way to do nat. > choice? or i can use pf somehow, I never used pf before, > so i would like some advise here... > > Thanks in advance, > -- WBR, Alexander