Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 15:23:45 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980221152201.2036A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <19980221172142.33725@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Tim Tsai wrote: > > that number depending on how the drive responds. With the Atlas II, a > > simplistic algorithm will cause the OS to drop down as low as 2 > > transactions if you hit the drive with the right I/O pattern (say a restore > > from another disk). > > As somebody who has a number of Atlas II's, does anybody know if Quantum > has a fix for this or are we stuck with it? I do not see a firmware > section on Quantum's website (not that I really want to do that to a > production drive anyway). ftp://ftp.quantum.com/Firmware/ has some stuff. > More reasons to keep buying IBM's I guess. More reasons to keep buying Seagate Barracuda's too... Not that you could buy new Atlas IIs anymore. There were replaced by the Atlas IIIs quite a while ago. > Tim Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980221152201.2036A-100000>