Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 00:09:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 i386.h Message-ID: <20020531000212.X29067-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200205300604.g4U64EL88242@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 May 2002, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2002/05/29 23:04:14 PDT > > Modified files: > contrib/gcc/config/i386 i386.h > Log: > Seems we are not ready for revision 1.8. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.9 +2 -1 src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.h I think 1.8 is just wrong. -Di386 is standard pollution on i386's if the user requests a non-C compiler by not using -ansi or -std=c89 or whatever. gcc does some cleaning of its own pre-defines in some cases (if it does cleaning, then it always creates aliases with underscores, then it omits the originals when a standard is specified). I guess this doesn't apply here, since it should be possible for bad implementations to put all the pollution that they want in the cpp spec. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020531000212.X29067-100000>