Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 May 2000 01:31:23 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Preemptive kernel on older X86 hardware 
Message-ID:  <82645.959243483@localhost>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2000 19:08:00 PDT." <200005250208.TAA78220@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     On intel anyway, subroutine calls are *cheap*, especially compared
>     to the overhead of a locked instruction or even an L1 cache miss.

I don't believe this is true on all the architectures FreeBSD is
anticipated to run on in the "near future", however.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82645.959243483>