Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:07:38 -0600 From: Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen@FreeBSD.org> To: Ravi Pokala <rpokala@mac.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r309625 - head/sbin/rcorder Message-ID: <b33b9428-d753-f5dc-28af-e51feebb2c45@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <D3F01801-07D7-4218-8ED7-E2D3ED9EE8D7@panasas.com> References: <201612061549.uB6Fndxo044249@repo.freebsd.org> <D3F01801-07D7-4218-8ED7-E2D3ED9EE8D7@panasas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/06/2016 11:30, Ravi Pokala wrote: > For grins, I ran this on my build server. The resulting graph is... > complex. But one thing was immediately clear: neither > /etc/rc.d/dhclient and /etc/rc.d/natd depend on anything. That seems > wrong: I would expect them to have some sort of dependency on > NETWORKING, either BEFORE (since dhclient may be involved in bringing > up the network) or REQUIRE (since it doesn’t make sense to run a > networking daemon like natd before networking is up). I saw that, too. I'm pretty sure they're not called directly, but are called from other scripts, such as network.subr and ipfw, respectively. They certainly /look/ like they can be called directly. Maybe that's leftover from an older style of configuration? I defer to the rc experts. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b33b9428-d753-f5dc-28af-e51feebb2c45>