From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Dec 6 19:07:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B454C6A10C; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0670E15A5; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BB685648E; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:07:39 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r309625 - head/sbin/rcorder To: Ravi Pokala , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201612061549.uB6Fndxo044249@repo.freebsd.org> From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:07:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:07:40 -0000 On 12/06/2016 11:30, Ravi Pokala wrote: > For grins, I ran this on my build server. The resulting graph is... > complex. But one thing was immediately clear: neither > /etc/rc.d/dhclient and /etc/rc.d/natd depend on anything. That seems > wrong: I would expect them to have some sort of dependency on > NETWORKING, either BEFORE (since dhclient may be involved in bringing > up the network) or REQUIRE (since it doesn’t make sense to run a > networking daemon like natd before networking is up). I saw that, too. I'm pretty sure they're not called directly, but are called from other scripts, such as network.subr and ipfw, respectively. They certainly /look/ like they can be called directly. Maybe that's leftover from an older style of configuration? I defer to the rc experts. Eric