Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:50:01 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] posix_fallocate support removed from ZFS, lld affected Message-ID: <e6db372e-05e6-6ffb-b615-657d14cccdf5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DBOm%2BmXE=fKj%2BuHMGojnPKPrpiz-y2mMKXyg58-%2BeWHQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <7e5599e4-2faa-29b6-4fb2-a0744a12681a@FreeBSD.org> <1509989176.99235.79.camel@freebsd.org> <153bfe2b-e65e-2036-3391-984c6ba00ffe@FreeBSD.org> <CAPyFy2DBOm%2BmXE=fKj%2BuHMGojnPKPrpiz-y2mMKXyg58-%2BeWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/11/2017 17:02, Ed Maste wrote: > On 7 November 2017 at 13:12, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> I hope that lld is not that widely used now. >> But I admit that I put the cart before the horse. >> I didn't expect that posix_fallocate is used in the development toolchain and I >> didn't try to check for it. > > For amd64 it is probably not a very large problem; it's not used by > default and those who have enabled it can likely adapt. However, it is > used by arm64 and is the default linker in FreeBSD 11.1, so we'll need > to go with either an errata fix or Kostik's p_osrel suggestion to > avoid breaking the package builds. I agree with that proposal. I think that that is what I should have done from the very start. I need a little bit of help to implement it, though. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e6db372e-05e6-6ffb-b615-657d14cccdf5>