From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 18 18:13:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D80416A41F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from mail.ecolines.ru (ns.ecolines.ru [81.3.181.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8EB43D5D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (qmail 25165 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2005 18:16:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO doom.homeunix.org) (ip@212.113.114.54) by mail.ecolines.ru with ESMTPA; 18 Dec 2005 18:16:55 -0000 Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBIICNRR009397 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:24 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBIICM6u009396 for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:22 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:12:22 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051218181222.GA9375@doom.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: SHA256 checksum in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:13:18 -0000 Hi, Is anyone knows what was the reason to add SHA256 checksum check in ports? Why MD5 was insufficient? P.S. Please CC me. -ip -- Laugh and the world laughs with you. cry and ... you have to blow your nose.