From owner-freebsd-commit  Thu Jul 27 21:15:24 1995
Return-Path: commit-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id VAA26247
          for commit-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:15:24 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id VAA26234
          for cvs-share-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:15:22 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA26227
          ; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:15:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA05812; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:13:37 -0700
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-share@freefall.cdrom.com,
        jkh@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/syscons/keymaps Makefile 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jul 1995 14:02:20 +1000."
             <199507280402.OAA08201@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 21:13:37 -0700
Message-ID: <5809.806904817@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: commit-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >> sio.4 in 2.1 now documents a 2.2 flag that happens to be a no-op in 2.1.
> 
> >Hmmm.  I didn't think that merging the docs from 2.2 would run into
> >this kind of problem.  Shall I revert the doc, or shall we simply
> >settle for a documented no-op?  I'm partial to the latter, myself..
> 
> Leave it, but please be more careful about grabbing bits of 2.2.
> 
> Bruce

Trust me, I generally am.  I just didn't think we'd diverged enough to
start invalidating docs..  My mistake..

						Jordan