Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:21:15 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        Lance Bland <lbland@vvi.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: is errno thread safe? (was Re: Porting from win32 to UNIX: Sockets)
Message-ID:  <20020821202114.GE97484@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <F4B19F04-B540-11D6-9FB6-0030659A531A@vvi.com>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208211547160.17257-100000@janeway.vonbek.dhs.org> <F4B19F04-B540-11D6-9FB6-0030659A531A@vvi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 21), Lance Bland said:
> hi-
> 
> is errno thread safe?

man errno:

     Nearly all of the system calls provide an error number referenced
     via the external identifier errno.  This identifier is defined in
     <sys/errno.h> as

           extern int * __error();
           #define errno (* __error())

     The __error() function returns a pointer to a field in the thread
     specific structure for threads other than the initial thread.  For
     the initial thread and non-threaded processes, __error() returns a
     pointer to a global errno variable that is compatible with the
     previous definition.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020821202114.GE97484>