From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jun 18 18:14:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA14682
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iworks.InterWorks.org (deischen@iworks.interworks.org [128.255.18.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA14674;
          Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iworks.InterWorks.org
	(1.37.109.8/16.2) id AA01520; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:10:26 -0500
Message-Id: <9606190110.AA01520@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 20:10:26 -0500
From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
To: sos@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: As of 960608, routed now complains bitterly..
Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com,
        wollman@lcs.mit.edu
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Well, to be honest I've switched back to the old routed :(
> The new routed gives me all kinds of trouble, it even messes
> up my PPP connection and the nameserver info etc I get automatically
> that way. For me the new routed is UNUSABLE...
> Last I saw (and remember) it practically deleted all my routes so
> I had to put them in staically to get a usable network.
> (And no my config is not exotic or something)

Yeah, me too.  When I start up a PPP (kernel) session, I have to
do a manual "route add default ..." because it deleted/lost the
default route set by pppd.

Dan Eischen
deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org