From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 25 21:41:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01EC16A4D1; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:41:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7F43D1F; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:41:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DEwYx-000Kyo-Dq; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:41:51 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:41:51 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: John Polstra Message-ID: <20050325214151.GD62048@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200503252138.j2PLc6gJ081928@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503252138.j2PLc6gJ081928@repoman.freebsd.org> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cvsup Makefile ports/net/cvsup/files patch-ae X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:42:00 -0000 On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:38:06PM +0000, John Polstra wrote: > jdp 2005-03-25 21:38:06 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > net/cvsup Makefile > Added files: > net/cvsup/files patch-ae > Log: > Add a patch for cvsupd to make it honor the "refuse" file for files > that are in the Attic. This solves the problem people are having > where their INDEX* files are being deleted even though they have > them listed in the refuse file. Since the bug is in the server, > mirror sites will need to upgrade their CVSup installation in order > for users to benefit from this fix. > > Note: I bumped PORTREVISION from 0 to 2, intentionally skipping 1. > The amd64 version of this port had already bumped it to 1, and I > didn't want to confuse matters by bumping the other architectures to > the same revision number. Thanks! -Kirill