From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jan  6  2:16:42 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210614CA3
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  6 Jan 2000 02:16:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net)
Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost)
	by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24363;
	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:15:51 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:15:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>
To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
Cc: Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>,
	Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001061554530.26779-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Alexey made no statement about performance, so don't turn this into an
issue it isn't. 

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:

>> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got
>>damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on
>>installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the
>>only point its got going 
>
>Bullsh*t!  FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any
>opposite statements.
>
>./danfe
>
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message