From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  6 12:19:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D680C37B401; Fri,  6 Jun 2003 12:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9F37043FBD; Fri,  6 Jun 2003 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7])
	by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56JJjrN066174
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12])
	by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56JJiOs080375
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56JJiAX001598;
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h56JJhkQ001597;
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:19:43 +0200
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030606191942.GC1290@cicely12.cicely.de>
References: <20030606.123654.96603092.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<XFMail.20030606150443.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030606150443.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.1-RELEASE alpha
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 19:19:55 -0000

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:04:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 06-Jun-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <XFMail.20030606141331.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
> >             John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >  Also, we haven't
> > recorded our info in the underlying pci register.  Don't know if that
> > will matter for other OSes that are booted after we are.
> 
> Don't think it matters as far as reboots, but I do think that this
> code should write the updated intpin to the actual config register.

I have no clue what alphas would think about this when we use that
codepath some day.
In some cases the inline registers on alpha seem to be correct but have
different numbering than we use within FreeBSD.
I rather prefer not to change informations that SRM or PAL might use.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de