From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Fri Mar 31 18:45:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86231D26571; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C3523C; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17FAB10A82E; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:45:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Grehan Cc: Ian Lepore , Allan Jude , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316311 - in head: lib/libstand sys/boot/geli sys/boot/i386/gptboot sys/boot/i386/loader sys/boot/i386/zfsboot Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:29:20 -0700 Message-ID: <11865010.raXmoPpVZB@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201703310004.v2V04W3A043449@repo.freebsd.org> <1490973411.64669.121.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.baldwin.cx); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:45:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:45:52 -0000 On Friday, March 31, 2017 09:04:51 AM Peter Grehan wrote: > > So... can anyone provide a clue what's "explicit" (or different in any > > way) between explicit_bzero() and normal bzero()? > > > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=explicit_bzero&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+12-current It should be called 'bzero_now_I_mean_it()' (but then we would need some other function called anybody_want_a_peanut()) -- John Baldwin