Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 02:44:45 -0800 (PST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> Cc: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>, Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>, Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060242360.227-100000@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Adam wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote: > > >> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got > >>damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on > >>installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the > >>only point its got going > > > >Bullsh*t! FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any > >opposite statements. > > > > Alexey made no statement about performance, so don't turn this into an > issue it isn't. > He did make a statement about reliability, he should check his facts, ext2 has many misfeatures that make it unsuitable for mission critical deployment. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060242360.227-100000>