From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 12:08:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABCC16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:08:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cl-mailhost.FernUni-Hagen.de (sycamore.fernuni-hagen.de [132.176.114.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF95D43D39 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from q5480035@mailstore.FernUni-Hagen.de) Received: from mailstore.fernuni-hagen.de ([132.176.114.185]) by cl-mailhost.FernUni-Hagen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1C0J3b-0003QS-1y; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:08:43 +0200 Received: from [217.9.102.3] (account ) by mailstore.fernuni-hagen.de (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.6) with HTTP id 6745289; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:08:42 +0200 From: "Marc van Woerkom" To: Subhro , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.6 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:08:42 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Marc van Woerkom Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and Windows XP on one system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:08:44 -0000 >Well FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 is running on my box with >Windiws XP in >dual boot. So the installation definitely works. Ok, that is already a good hint. What boot manager do you use for that dual boot system? >First of all, have u >fixed the master >drive at the end of the cable and the slave drive in the >middle >connector?. I need to check that. I did not know about such a preference, and assumed both connectors are equal. >probability you have already guessed. Yes it may be the >BIOS. Its a >good move to search the manufacturer site for updated >BIOS and flash >it. However be careful. Perhaps I better try to get a newer board.. but then I need newer ram, newer proc.. the usual upgrade madness. :) > Thirdly, I would say put the 40G >drive as >master as olders drives have buggy controller firmware >and they *may* >create troubles in case of newer slaves. OK, I'll try that. >Fourtly, Jumper >the drives >explicitly to be master and slave. Do not rely on the CS. I hope, I did that. But I check. Thanks a lot for the hints! Marc