From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 30 17:54:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6BD1065670 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f190.google.com (mail-px0-f190.google.com [209.85.216.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2878FC19 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi28 with SMTP id 28so2016449pxi.7 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zuaWbjhVakHIu9dhgfIKIrjxDXtidWGKC0W0F0VoN0w=; b=SqMH7dLUkFbtpDluqox4yMM9YHioFFIpLpOcWSROL6yFjd9eeR2ML5Bp4fCJnTo/x5 dnVNMnF6Txjyiaud5eyn/sHxbwLDoflIrV3dpzl87Il0ilets3a7SZqWc6jrSsfl7cDE KoH3zKcKnSfrd5Ad2zm2LFxIENcpnemNCpvH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sAVj1tdhJzeULKGGr62MXgBPcYlGDEG5zzD4KqubsbqpELF5zccQ5DL+BvLe+SQlun Zs7Bt9jEWYVHAeora6TvuthVh7CoA8RWprMquvz3XmkbUjG6JtdGdT1zwitjUBmBR+IM KbAE630MyeWFx6sI1QqFc8cxqHRlwQf7PVWXg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.75.16 with SMTP id x16mr187837wfa.155.1256925239613; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <370279.86430.qm@web56502.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <6201873e0910300904v5767894bkec0e7543e28aa951@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:53:59 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e0910301053s77147e9dlfcd631f3385fa58a@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Freminlins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Neil Short , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Effing HAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:54:00 -0000 On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Freminlins wrote: > 2009/10/30 Adam Vande More > > >> No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage. HAL >> has shared library's just like many other applications. >> > > Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by > the fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory free. > I am unable to replicate this. > > This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM. >> > > Not entirely true. I didn't misinterpret the data - it was accurate. I > didn't read the FM, but then again if HAL worked as it is meant to, I > shouldn't need to. Isn't that the whole point of HAL? Starting X and finding > no keyboard or mouse working is hardly what I would call success. > Nowhere have you demonstrated HAL is not working as it's meant to. This is pointless to argue about since it's so easy to debug. Simply post the X log from your original state, and the reason it didn't work will be clearly shown. -- Adam Vande More