From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 08:46:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94EE16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:46:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252B443D41 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:46:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40460BED#8B65E1F007; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:46:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 60004688B; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:46:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:46:41 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20040303164641.GA94900@stack.nl> References: <200402291546.i1TFkZ0w070591@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040302163419.M8656@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040302163419.M8656@gamplex.bde.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re: NULL vs 0 vs 0L bikeshed time X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:46:39 -0000 On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:39:23PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > The intent is to catch use of NULL where 0 or (0L) should be used. > > It generates extra warnings (I promise to fix these). > > This may involve fixing hundreds if not thousands of ports. Mwah, I've been running with a similar patch for three years now and haven't encountered any real problems... Marc