Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:41:29 +0200 From: Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org> To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information) Message-ID: <20000106124112.D8865@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001061554530.26779-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>; from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 03:56:44PM %2B0600 References: <20000106113309.B8865@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001061554530.26779-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wasn't necessary talking about performance, there's more to a filesystem than just that. I also wasn't comparing it to ext2fs, although in 5 years of using ext2fs I haven't had a filesystem messed up so badly that I lost data. When ext3fs, xfs and reiserfs comes into their own, performance comparisons will be a moot point anyway. On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 03:56:44PM +0600, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote: > > Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the only point its got going > > Bullsh*t! FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any > opposite statements. > > ./danfe > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000106124112.D8865>