Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:20:33 +0200
From:      Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <19990727222033.A75086@bnc.net>
In-Reply-To: <199907271959.NAA27155@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 01:59:58PM -0600
References:  <199907271951.NAA27049@mt.sri.com> <199907271956.OAA13811@aurora.sol.net> <199907271959.NAA27155@mt.sri.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> I'd like to see people other than you, I, and Matt discussing this.
> Other people who use this feature of IPFW that have an opinion one way
> or the other should speak up.

I must admit being a bad boy - I'm using ipfw for firewalling and
accounting: "log" rules for catching bad guys (and I'm not caring for a
limit there as I'm preferring a DoS by crashing the firewall over someone
getting through unnoticed) and the counters for accounting (that's why I'd
like to have some "read and reset" function so I can milk them without
dripping too much).


Achim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990727222033.A75086>