From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 28 15:52:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:52:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.otel.net (gw3.OTEL.net [212.36.8.151])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D8A43D48
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:52:00 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from tbyte@OTEL.net)
Received: from dragon.otel.net ([212.36.8.135])
	by mail.otel.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1CCKGj-0000wX-Kp
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:51:57 +0300
Message-ID: <41598899.9020706@OTEL.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:51:53 +0300
From: Iasen Kostov <tbyte@OTEL.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040728
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20040925011147.1388.SHINO@fornext.org>
	<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924135726.82478I-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<20040925074848.138C.SHINO@fornext.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040925074848.138C.SHINO@fornext.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: High rate traffic silence an em interface.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:52:00 -0000

Shunsuke SHINOMIYA wrote:
<snip>

>
>... <snip>
>  
>
>>send: No buffer space available
>>send: No buffer space available
>>send: No buffer space available
>>
>>start:             1096067716.000000000
>>finish:            1096067726.000841883
>>send calls:        13001
>>send errors:       2841
>>approx send rate:  1016
>>approx error rate: 0
>>waited:            4887009
>>approx wait rate:  375
>>    
>>
>
> Would you reproduce the problem by this procedures?
>
>  
>
Yes I can confirm that - after some time(a day) a moderately loaded 
iface with about 7kpps gives the same
error on send(No buffer space available).
This is with -BETA2 hardware is :

em0@pci2:1:0:   class=0x020000 card=0x10018086 chip=0x10268086 rev=0x04 
hdr=0x00
    vendor   = 'Intel Corporation'
    device   = '82545GM Gigabit Ethernet Controller'
    class    = network
    subclass = ethernet