Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:43:55 +0200 From: Udo Schweigert <udo.schweigert@siemens.com> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updated dialog-based config patches Message-ID: <20021010054355.GA89705@alaska.cert.siemens.de> In-Reply-To: <P0IUBazPzs@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20021006202120.GA96047@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020930062804.GA50001@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021006202120.GA96047@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021007161324.GA96101@alaska.cert.siemens.de> <P0IUBazPzs@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 06:35:19 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Udo Schweigert wrote: > >> Everything then works OK, i.e. dialog is comming up, and the chosen options >> are recorded in the /var/db/ports/... file. But: the option is not in effect. >> Only aborting the make with a new "make clean; make" will have the chosen >> options in effect. I think this is because the /var/db/ports file is then read >> on startup whereas options chosen in dialog do not make their way to "make". >> Do you think there's a possible solution for that? Or do I miss something? > > USE_SUBMAKE=yes > so the options are included in the next step. > Infortunately not. From bsd.port.mk: # USE_SUBMAKE: Set this if you want that each of the port's main 6 targets # (extract, patch, configure, build, install and package) to be # executed in a separate make(1) process. Useful when one of ... The fetch target is part of extract, so the patches wont be fetched. Best regards -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voice : +49 89 636 42170 CT IC CERT, Siemens CERT | Fax : +49 89 636 41166 D-81730 Muenchen / Germany | email : udo.schweigert@siemens.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021010054355.GA89705>