Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:30:24 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: files/patch-* pathname separators Message-ID: <xzpu0zdv7hb.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <40864E82.90904@portaone.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:35:46 %2B0300") References: <200404181922.i3IJMkTf044706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040419032304.GA61048@regency.nsu.ru> <20040419103101.GB26102@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040419110810.GA24385@regency.nsu.ru> <20040420200903.GA6174@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040421094050.GA5052@FreeBSD.org> <40864E82.90904@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> writes: > I disagree. `::' is pretty harmless, I never had any problems due to > it. And, yes, I use bash as my primary shell. Seconded. I like the :: convention, and David seems to be the only one to have a problem with it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu0zdv7hb.fsf>