From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 03:46:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BA116A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:46:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB1043D1F for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:46:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6218A37E47; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:46:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.177]) by av1-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5174F37E43 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:46:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from sentinel (81-232-139-217-no23.business.telia.com [81.232.139.217]) by smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAD138003 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:46:02 +0100 (CET) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:45:54 +0100 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcUlI6lpZ37zORAtSSushiLIchY5yg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Polling mode vs. net.isr.enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:46:04 -0000 Does the value of net.isr.enable (0 or 1) have any effect when running an interface in polling mode? If I understand correctly, with net.isr.enable set to 1 the processing of incoming packets are handled directly in the ISR (interrupt service routine?) instead of being deferred to the ithread. However, polling mode means no interrupts so the ISR is never called(?). /Daniel Eriksson