From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 17 6:50:24 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A127D37B403; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 06:50:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7HDoAn21122; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:50:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:44:01 EDT." <200108171344.f7HDi2543074@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:50:10 +0200 Message-ID: <21120.998056210@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200108171344.f7HDi2543074@aldan.algebra.com>, Mikhail Teterin write s: >On 17 Aug, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> phk 2001/08/17 02:34:56 PDT >> >> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) >> release Makefile >> Log: >> Don't make chflags mandatory, building releases on NFS should be possible. > >BTW, will our NFS ever support chflags (when both client and server know >what it means)? Or is that intentional, that it does not? Thanks, I don't think the NFS protocol defines the necessary primitives... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message