From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr  1 20:29:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA04512
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 20:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04507
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 20:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA28986; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 20:29:03 -0800 (PST)
To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Ports distfile survey 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Apr 1997 17:26:53 PST."
             <199704020126.RAA28561@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> 
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 20:29:03 -0800
Message-ID: <28982.859955343@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Not much we can do about that.  Andrey suggested expanding it to
> DISTFILES1, DISTFILES2, ... and MASTER_SITES1, MASTER_SITES2, ... but
> that's going to be pretty complicated and I don't think it's worth the 
> extra lines in bsd.port.mk.

And I still think it would be more of a non-problem if we put
the master site FIRST.  Ahem ahem.. :-)

					Jordan