Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:43:19 +1100 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        feld@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [Bug 216867] IPFW workstation rules block DNSSEC resulting in DNS failure on freebsd.org domains
Message-ID:  <20170308013059.I87835@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216867-7515-niEJ7KtnU7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-216867-7515@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-216867-7515-niEJ7KtnU7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:49:25 +0000, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote:
 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
 > 
 > Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> changed:
 > 
 >            What    |Removed                     |Added
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >                  CC|                            |feld@FreeBSD.org
 > 
 > --- Comment #1 from Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> ---
 > Needs some testers, but this should fix it
 > 
 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9920

I've always used these rules from 'client' and 'simple' rulesets:
	${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag
which I long ago found essential to pass frags from zen.spamhaus.org

I haven't used reass - nor DNSSEC - so can't really evaluate, nor test 
currently, so I won't pollute the bug report with what may be musing.

However, looking at the review patch, I do wonder if the reass shouldn't
precede, rather than follow, the check-state?

cheers, Ian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170308013059.I87835>