From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 12 04:33:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3341A106564A; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (ns1.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60C8FC0A; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com ([192.168.36.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/NinthNine) with ESMTP id n3C4XeiE005512; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:33:45 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:32:33 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: David Schultz Message-Id: <20090412133233.1dc58fcb.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090412040343.GA54862@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <200904111657.n3BGvpsC092703@svn.freebsd.org> <20090411210702.ce5325b9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20090412021841.673a200b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20090412030054.GA54299@zim.MIT.EDU> <20090412125047.fb6adf5a.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20090412040343.GA54862@zim.MIT.EDU> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.0; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stanislav Sedov , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura Subject: Re: svn commit: r190943 - head/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:33:47 -0000 On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:03:43 -0400 David Schultz wrote: > > Yes, no problem! Pth required singal.h's definision(SIGINT, > > SIGQUIT, ...), and it was already token care in pthread.h.in > > like following: > I don't understand how this is related to the problem; signal.h > and sys/signal.h are not the same header, nor does one include the > other. Simple-fully, no required signal.h. -- Norikatsu Shigemura