From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 17 6:57:54 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (misha.privatelabs.com [66.9.25.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F47837B405; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 06:57:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@misha.privatelabs.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.privatelabs.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f7HDvc710353; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:57:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200108171357.f7HDvc710353@misha.privatelabs.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile In-Reply-To: <21120.998056210@critter> "from Poul-Henning Kamp at Aug 17, 2001 03:50:10 pm" To: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200108171344.f7HDi2543074@aldan.algebra.com>, > Mikhail Teterin writes: > >On 17 Aug, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> phk 2001/08/17 02:34:56 PDT > >> > >> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > >> release Makefile > >> Log: > >> Don't make chflags mandatory, building releases on NFS > >> should be possible. > > > >BTW, will our NFS ever support chflags (when both client and server > >know what it means)? Or is that intentional, that it does not? > > I don't think the NFS protocol defines the necessary primitives... And noone would think of "embracing and extending it"? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message