From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 6 19:05:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA15155 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:05:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dsinw.com (dsinw.com [207.149.40.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA15142 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:05:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hamellr@dsinw.com) Received: from direct-source.com.direct-source.com (ppp114.pm3-0.pdx.dsinw.com [207.149.41.114]) by dsinw.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA04997 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:04:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 19:04:01 -0800 () From: Rick Hamell cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux In-Reply-To: <199811070252.SAA16703@athena.tera.com> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: hamellr@direct-source.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yes, *BSD bigots, it's true. My experiences with Linux > were fairly limited, but under normal `desktop' use it > was solid for the few weeks it was running. Of course, this attitude right here seperates 'us' from the Linux people. Talk to the average Linux user, and there is NOTHING better. Despite any amount of evidence to the contrary. Those of us who use FreeBSD tend to be of the 'right tool for the right job' mindset. > If your usage is heavy to extremely heavy, go with FreeBSD. > It's stability is becoming legendary. If your load is > much lighter and you might need commercial-ware, Linux > may be better. Of course, with it being ported to Linux... FreeBSD will get it eventually!!!! Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message