From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 16:52:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E9416A468 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B2813C44B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from bruce-a-mahs-computer.local (hornet.kitchenlab.org [64.142.31.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l8MGqChI018641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:52:13 -0700 Message-ID: <46F54826.7040608@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:51:50 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Kaduk References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 OpenPGP: id=5ba052c3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB918D9545EDAC5F9B126DA0A" Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:52:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB918D9545EDAC5F9B126DA0A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Ben Kaduk wrote: > On 9/22/07, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> >>>> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s >>>> (somewhat) new daily snapshot >>>> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use lite= rals for >>>> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven'= t found yet? >>> As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures. >> The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see >> src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment). >=20 > But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ? Ah sorry, I was unclear (no caffeine yet this morning). What I meant to say was that the release documents use this set of entities and that if you want to add entities for doc/ tree documents, using the same names might be good. Apologies for the confusion, I'm off to go make some tea now... Bruce --------------enigB918D9545EDAC5F9B126DA0A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG9Ugm2MoxcVugUsMRAv6WAJ4g9gfwaCiX3khLcDkw9U+52DGJOQCg4CcO Bmer2hbInl3NMAvPtTVs4kM= =dFzp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB918D9545EDAC5F9B126DA0A--