From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 10 15:10:07 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E248824F;
 Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:10:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from brewer.doug@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com
 [209.85.160.54])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1218FC0A;
 Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:10:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz17so1892866pbc.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:10:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=me+T1/LQ6QcphlWGpgsm1u3sJrj5DrdQS0SiVBZAXLA=;
 b=loHnKuMqgDQhVCpbz0LX2HrA3UQnVc1jqnwo34aE8M6ns0bzXZznat+da15M0CXoXF
 zHBbH2MXkocYvoSsX+S+HTIJFD4hZU4YHQw2W1lmhc0hzFRkINaxNc/p6mQk99gzf7mi
 kZbtMOv2pyq8/YrTCcgrsSqEqQ7wpqEleoMrS53hdgVUDAHgDIyo7HoXEVVPmQLFmxwz
 VVPBFag3la86yEz2/KYxryLq6nyGFz50o/rKNH81Cw+GNpSeJzia5Kg5TBui7uDjU1CE
 r2JUiyI0k4nIQwu7Ig389cMHT6Zt4S0MVeuv3UY7aPNCblseQGnUhGkofjVorc88V7l6
 hqOA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.232.195 with SMTP id tq3mr43170811pbc.70.1352560207199;
 Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.26.73 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:10:07 +0800
Message-ID: <CAG0V13Q6vsodid6iRret=Jo7wxWPp5HfVj_JCOkEPB7Eimjs4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
From: Doug Brewer <brewer.doug@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:20:26 +0000
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:10:08 -0000

Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line
> > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal
> > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free
> > on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M
> > ram..  just drop me a line..
>
> Hi,
>
> Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the
> cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a
> cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential
> diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each
> little change that I do.

Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well
on the train or at a cafe before being committed.

> I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small
> handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just
> that - build breaks. They're easily fixed.

I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam Leffler
was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an embedded device, right?),
he had never broke the build.

> Adrian

BR,
Doug.