Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:23:36 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pci_link.c acpi_pcib.cacpi_pcib_acpi.c acpi_pcib_pci.c acpi_pcibvar.h Message-ID: <411AAA78.2020401@root.org> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA3CIG6mhg/EWalKPQ174DNwEAAAAA@telia.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA3CIG6mhg/EWalKPQ174DNwEAAAAA@telia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eriksson wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > >>He's using an I/O APIC. These are probably all entries that >>don't have a link >>device but just a hardwired global interrupt number. Did you >>test that case? > > > Yes, I have "device apic" in my kernel config file. Is this a bad thing to > do for a UP system? > > I remember googling "device apic" and finding at least some info that seemed > to indicate that it was off by default in GENERIC simply because there are a > few I/O APICs that are buggy, and that it actually helped on systems with > properly working chips. No need to disable it although if disabling it fixes your problems, that would be an interesting data point. > Should I leave it out of my kernel config? (I'm just about to recompile with > Nate's extra debug output patch.) Leave it in. The debug output is more important right now. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?411AAA78.2020401>