From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Aug 6 1:22: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from snafu.adept.org (adsl-63-193-112-19.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.112.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49D014F99 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 01:22:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@snafu.adept.org) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by snafu.adept.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00249; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 01:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 01:21:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins To: Seth Cc: Alex Zepeda , Donald Wilde , Gregory Sutter , Jim Mock , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advocacy site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Seth wrote: > > You get no assurances, and that's OSS for you. Expecting more is wholey > > unreasonable. For instance if you could commit fixes, could we rely on > > you to dedicate a sizeable chunk of your time to closing PRs? > Actually, you could. Why not go through GNATS and search? Funny, your > name comes up only once. I'm so happy we now sound just like the Linux community. Here's a thought... if we have enough time to search GNATS to prove a point, or to write lengthy messages *bitching* about *bitching*, maybe we could set aside a wee bit of time to actually contribute to the project. Note to any reader: Make no mistake, I am not at all attempting to take any side in this argument. I am attempting to point out the foolishness in the argument itself, and, furthermore, attempting to remind myself that 'maturity' was, at some point, a FreeBSD trait. -Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message