Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 17:38:26 +1030 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Libretto 50 - US Version and PAO Message-ID: <199711040708.RAA01681@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:03:10 PDT." <199711040703.AAA03199@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199711030653.RAA01957@word.smith.net.au> Mike Smith writes: > : Just following on a discussion with Nate about the whole IRQ-in-CIS > : thing; can you throw the 'pccard dumpcis' output for your '589 this > : way, as well as the configuration index that you're currently using? > > Further experimentation has shown that the irq makes no difference at > all. What really did matter was the i/o range. The range 0x240-0x2e0 > was what caused the problems. After removing that range of addresses > and adding irqs, I was able to bring up the card on irq 10, 11 and 15. Gotcha. Want to bet there's something at 0x240? Nate; you're the last source of "the IRQ matters" evidence - can we reevaluate this when you're free to test your set? mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711040708.RAA01681>