From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 20:49:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010E0871; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3BC2459; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (149.169.100.84.rev.sfr.net [84.100.169.149]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 219F2A706; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449922A7; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:40 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Message-ID: <20130930224940.40b1e404@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:44 -0000 Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600, Brett Glass a écrit : Hello, > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The > improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling > messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing > lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are > actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual > systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for > everyone. I've seen two problems if you use poudriere (on ZFS only?) which occur in some loads (ie desktop running gvfsd). One fix is in 9-STABLE and the other one should be mfced soon. May be there will be an errata for 9.2-RELEASE for this ? I think that would be nice because 9.2 is stable as a Windows 3.11 with my load :-) Regards.