Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:50:48 +0000 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r313289 - head/graphics/rubygem-opengl Message-ID: <51329E68.5070307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=5x=DiHJE4AYEH-b6x2xfH9P6EGx0uQwE0aNRpaZOvNA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201303022003.r22K3pUh023275@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=5x=DiHJE4AYEH-b6x2xfH9P6EGx0uQwE0aNRpaZOvNA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/03/13 00:36, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 2 March 2013 15:03, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Log: >> - Fix build, at least with Ruby 1.9 > > The log does not match the action. Are you saying it doesn't build with Ruby 1.9 for you? Cause it does for me. > Does this not require a PORTEPOCH bump? > [10001 eitan@gravity (100)% ~ ]%pkg version -t 0.60.1 0.8.0 >> > > In fact, is this update going backwards or does upstream number versions oddly? > Has to do with the fact that it is actually a different gem. It used to be: http://rubygems.org/gems/ruby-opengl now it is: http://rubygems.org/gems/opengl I suppose PORTEPOCH is appropriate, sadly. I'll fix it, thanks for the heads up. Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51329E68.5070307>