From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Jun 29 20:32:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from wilma.widomaker.com (wilma.widomaker.com [204.17.220.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AE437B408 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:32:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shannon@daydream.shannon.net) Received: from [209.96.179.117] (helo=escape.shannon.net) by wilma.widomaker.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15GBUj-0003sb-00 for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:32:30 -0400 Received: from daydream (daydream.shannon.net [192.168.1.10]) by escape.shannon.net (8.11.0/8.8.8) with ESMTP id f5U37Jc20816 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from shannon by daydream with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15GB6N-0001A1-00 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:07:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:07:19 -0400 From: Shannon Hendrix To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lets not bash Windows or M$ at every opportunity {was: FreeBSD and Microsoft} Message-ID: <20010629230718.C3383@widomaker.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010629230803.A18249@hades.hell.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010629230803.A18249@hades.hell.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:08:03PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > If by 'better products' you mean Windows, then I'd have to be the > devil's advocate and suggest that Windows does have some good things > that Linux and/or FreeBSD don't have. For instance, they do have > support for more multimedia file formats. [snip] This is by design. They create a constant stream of new and different media formats, and refuse to disclose the details so that all platforms can easily use them. There is no reason for this other than your basic, predatory, monopolistic tactics. This doesn't make Windows better in any sense of the word, it only makes the overall plan that much more wrong. > I am also afraid of seeing something bad happen, such as the Justice > Department winning Microsoft in this case, and making a habit of stopping > companies that grow `large' in their opinion. Um... anti-trust has been in effect for nearly 100 years, and Microsoft isn't the first to be targeted. IMHO, not enough was done, and I just read in the paper that the breakup of Microsoft has been overruled. Microsoft is getting a slap on the wrist compared to other companies. So, it appears the trend is to be _easier_ on large companies, not harder. > Then as time passes, this `large' might begin to shrink in size, and that > would be most improper. The government would never do that, because then the sums of money thrown to the pigs in DC would also grow smaller. You need to think more like a CongressCritter(TM) sometimes... :) -- shannon@widomaker.com _________________________________________________ ______________________/ armchairrocketscientistgraffitiexistentialist "Consulting wouldn't be what it is today without Microsoft Windows" -- Chris Pinkham To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message