Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:38:40 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@whistle.com> Cc: se@freebsd.org (Stefan Esser), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Video Card Q Message-ID: <199704182338.QAA01538@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:13:06 PDT." <199704182313.QAA27968@crab.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I still swear by my old S3 968 with 4MB and by the way the card is faster than the Matrox Millenium when is operated at depths of 24 or 16 which is what are normally use over here. Not sure however I think that XFree86 does not fully support most of the accelerated features on the Matrox Millenium. Amancio >From The Desk Of Doug Ambrisko : > Stefan Esser writes: > | On Apr 18, Wilson MacGyver <macgyver@db-net.com> wrote: > | > I too highly recommand the Matrox Millenium. I've seen the 4MB > | > version for $250. It's upgradable to 8MB. Blazing fast... > | > Xfree86 has driver for it as of 3.1.2, but Xi's driver for it > | > is great! > | > | Is XFree really an option for the Millenium, or is a S3 > | or Mach64 based card a better choice for my new system ? > > My 4M Millenium runs solid at 1280x1024x24 with 3.1.2. The only problem I > had was the card conflicting with COM2 until I moved COM2 to another address. > I switched to it since Adobe Illustrator had trouble with the Diamond drivers > at 1280x1024. > > Doug A.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704182338.QAA01538>