Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 16:56:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: David Miller <dmiller@search.sparks.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Farms? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091650180.28082-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <20000509141329.G19135@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >Yup and yup, subscribe to the security mailing list and the CVS >mailing list, take special note of all changes done to RELENG_4 >(-stable) when you see any special ones that you think may be >essential, then run your update. I am not sure whether this has been brought up before or not, but here it goes. I am not at all familiar with how the CVS commit messsages are funneled to cvs-all@FreeBSD.org and admit that before I ask this. Is it not possible to break out a seperate cvs-stable@FreeBSD.org mailing list that would contain all cvs commits sans HEAD. Most of the committs happen to HEAD, but a good many STABLE users subscribe to cvs-all watching and waiting for commits to whichever STABLE branch they are on. These MFCs are all they are interested in and sending them the full commit mailing list seems like a waste of bandwidth. Those active developers on the HEAD branch and those who track -CURRENT can still subscribe to the full cvs-all list, but it would enable those who are only interested in commits to RELENG_2_2, RELENG_3 and RELENG_4 to conserve bandwidth and mail spool space. Thoughts? Caveats? Brandon D. Valentine -- bandix@looksharp.net Illegitimi non carborundum. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091650180.28082-100000>