From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 02:11:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05688A36D5A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7C81A89 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB42BvIj088101 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:11:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201796] Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Set PostgreSQL 9.4 as default Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 02:11:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: girgen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- exp-run+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 02:11:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201796 Chris Hutchinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |portmaster@bsdforge.com --- Comment #16 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff from comment #15) > I don't now if it is really needed to extract libpq. My point is more like > the statement from Mathieu. We need pg_upgrade working, which requires > existence of old and new binaries of PG. > Of course we could try to allow installation of multiple > postgresql-instances. This would be handy sometimes - and in such a case.= Is > there an argument against this way? I've been pondering all this, since it was brought up in the mailing list. I had a look at what it would take to at least use pg_upgrade. The best results seem to be when the previous version is still installed (not just the previous DB). Anyway, it doesn't seem like it would be terribly difficult to incorporate pg_upgrade into the normal course of upgrading the port. The only potential pitfall I see, is should the newer version being installed introduces things not previously available. Which would require whoever maintains this port to incorporate whatever required, as recommended into the process to compensate/accommodate for the difference(s). Does it make any sense to break pg_upgrade out, as it's own port? Then REQUIRE, as needed? --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=