From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 19 10:59:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9FA37B401 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mhub-m2.tc.umn.edu (mhub-m2.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677843EB2 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:59:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryans@gamersimpact.com) Received: from mhub0.tc.umn.edu (mhub0.tc.umn.edu [128.101.131.40]) by mhub-m2.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:59:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from [128.101.186.124] by mail.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:59:38 -0600 Subject: NFS Reserved Port Only? From: Ryan Sommers To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1040320787.373.30.camel@lobo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 19 Dec 2002 11:59:47 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mhub0.tc.umn.edu #+LO+TR Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does nfs_reserved_port_only really make NFS that much more secure? Or is this more of a depricated option. Ryan -- Ryan "leadZERO" Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com ICQ: 1019590 AIM/MSN: leadZERO To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message