Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:36:12 -0800 From: Harlan Stenn <harlan@minnie.everett.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: harlan@everett.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -P and local changes Message-ID: <20041226213612.DB1EB5483D@minnie.everett.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:01:38 PST." <20041226150137.GB2566@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports
first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any
changed prerequisite packages as well.
If a way can be found to say "Do not fetch these packages" then this will
become a much easier process.
H
--
>> Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports
>> for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having
>> them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values
>> and wrapped as a package from the -p flag).
>Doesn't it use packages if they're present in the ${PACKAGES}
>directory (/usr/ports/packages by default)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041226213612.DB1EB5483D>