Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:12:40 -0500 From: Greg Barniskis <nalists@scls.lib.wi.us> Cc: Noah <admin2@enabled.com>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FTPd recommendation? Message-ID: <445A27F8.8010406@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <445A0D3C.4010800@scls.lib.wi.us> References: <200605041400.k44E0c7Y021532@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <445A0D3C.4010800@scls.lib.wi.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Barniskis wrote: > Jerry McAllister wrote: > >> Using what comes with the base system. >> Having no problem. > > Same here. If functionality is in the base, my philosophy is that > replacing it violates the KISS principle unless the replacement offers > some additional functionality that justifies the change. OK, so... after I wrote this I looked at the vsftpd site recommended by others and I'd have to say this probably is a justified swap. The number of high end vsftpd users (including -- hint hint, enable_cluestick="YES" -- freebsd.org) is a pretty clear testimonial. I'm guessing the only reason this baby is not the base ftpd is its inherent GPLness. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) <gregb at scls.lib.wi.us>, (608) 266-6348
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445A27F8.8010406>