Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:52:24 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: Dick Davies <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance Message-ID: <3aaaa3a050111125231e3db3c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050110120556.GI25665@lb.tenfour> References: <109593615.20050109100927@wanadoo.fr> <20050109012537.A79965@logik.ath.cx> <139201652.20050109105314@wanadoo.fr> <20050110120556.GI25665@lb.tenfour>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have noticed with all the work gone in to 5.x to optimise SMP performance in return uniprocessor performance has suffered considerably I think this is what the concerns are about? Will future releases such as 5.4 remedy this by fixing the drop in performance on uniprocessor machines? Chris On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:05:56 +0000, Dick Davies <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> wrote: > * Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> [0154 09:54]: > > Mark writes: > > > > M> Ah, this point fascinates me. Running for years? Do you ever have > > M> to recompile your kernel? :) > > > > Usually once when I first install the OS, then never again (unless I > > change something in the hardware, which I hardly ever do). Windows > > often has to be rebooted just to install a new application (although > > that's a problem with the application, not a problem with the OS, in > > most cases). > > And what about security patches? > > -- > 'If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a > house of cards... Checkmate!' > -- Zapp. Brannigan > Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a050111125231e3db3c>