Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:48:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907272247490.64223-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
In-Reply-To: <199907271915.NAA26782@mt.sri.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about:
	per-rule logging limits
	logging limit raising
	logging limit resetting
Which would all NOT affect the statistics?
I am, yes, suggesting I will implement it.

 Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
 green@FreeBSD.org                   _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
     FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!        _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/              _ |___/___/___/ 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907272247490.64223-100000>