From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Jul 27 19:50:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from janus.syracuse.net (janus.syracuse.net [205.232.47.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F12914C1A; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 19:50:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by janus.syracuse.net (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA67212; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:48:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: janus.syracuse.net: green owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:48:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" X-Sender: green@janus.syracuse.net To: Nate Williams Cc: Joe Greco , hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero In-Reply-To: <199907271915.NAA26782@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about: per-rule logging limits logging limit raising logging limit resetting Which would all NOT affect the statistics? I am, yes, suggesting I will implement it. Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message