From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 17 19:08:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D57B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AA943D45
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:08:51 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 6F4D6530E; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:08:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id DE489530A; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:08:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 6847233CA7; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:08:43 +0100 (CET)
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
References: <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl>
	<20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<xzp3c8adq8c.fsf@dwp.des.no> <p06020414bc7d6996f710@[128.113.24.47]>
	<20040317023908.GA56755@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<p06020419bc7e5827e15c@[128.113.24.47]>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:08:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <p06020419bc7e5827e15c@[128.113.24.47]> (Garance A. Drosihn's
 message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:37:46 -0500")
Message-ID: <xzp65d297ic.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Reasons for 64-bTT & DHCP import
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:08:52 -0000

Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote:
> > I committed a ton of patches to the port last night, including
> > one that should fix the 64-bit time_t issue.
> This is excellent to see.  Thanks!  Hopefully that will go a long
> way to fixing the problems that people are seeing, and then we
> can get the same fixes into the base-system version.

well...  a bunch of those patches were actually taken from the base
system :)  the log message contained a fairly detailed list.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no